promotion-upgrade-requests

Imported from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills (skills/promotion-upgrade-requests/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill promotion-upgrade-requests. Copyright stays with the author.

Promotion & Upgrade Requests

What it is: Promotion, grade upgrade, role change and salary revision requests.

Overview

Works out the smallest useful Promotion & Upgrade Requests setup for the business in front of it, then builds it only when asked. The default output is a short recommendation, not a spreadsheet. Artifacts - CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, Notion mapping - are produced on request, from one field list so they cannot drift apart.

Layer: Layer 5: Develop. Fits: Growth stage. Table code: n/a.

When to Use This Skill

• promotion request
• grade upgrade tracker
• salary revision request
• internal mobility tracker

Also use it when the user says "promotion, grade upgrade, role change and salary revision requests", or describes the same process happening in a spreadsheet, a document or someone inboxes.

Do not use it for: payroll calculation, tax filing, or legal advice. This skill produces empty templates only - it never holds or processes real employee or customer data.

How It Works

Follow the shared execution contract. The module-specific rules below define only domain fields, decisions, calculations, and safety constraints.

Step 1 - Identify intent

Read the request and pick the intent before asking anything.

• "set up" or "build" or "create" -> the user wants artifacts; go to Step 2.
• "our process is ..." or "it is in a sheet" -> the user wants to move an existing process; capture it, then Step 2.
• "is this right" or "review" or "audit" -> the user wants a check, not a build; answer from what they share.
• "how do I ..." -> advice question; answer directly and offer the build only if it helps.

Ask only if this is the highest-value missing fact; otherwise proceed without an opener:

Q: Who can request a promotion?

Step 2 - Ask only what is missing

Skip anything the user already answered, in any earlier message. Ask the rest one at a time, and stop as soon as the remaining answers would not change the output.

• Requests - ask these as separate messages, in this order when still material: who requests; how often; whether the request includes a grade or role change. Never combine two of them into one clarification. For an ambiguous Requests answer, clarify who may request first, then wait.
• Criteria - Fixed criteria? / Performance score needed? / Time in role?
• Approval - Who approves? / One or two levels? / Effective date set by?
• Current process - How do you handle it now? / Email or nothing? / What gets delayed?
• Outcome - What do you need? / A request form, approvals or a record?

Never invent an answer. If the user does not know, record it as unknown and carry on.

Step 3 - Hold the internal context

Hold the answers in this shape. It stays internal - it is not shown to the user unless they ask, and it never carries a value the user did not give.

module: promotion-upgrade-requests
intent: null            # setup | advice | review | fix | build | convert | export
scale: null             # Starter | Growth | Scale, only if the answer changes it
areas:
  "Requests": null
  "Criteria": null
  "Approval": null
  "Current process": null
  "Outcome": null
requested_outputs: []   # csv | sql | json | notion | xlsx - requested formats only
confirmed_facts: []     # only what the user actually said
open_questions: []      # the unanswered ones, in the order worth asking

Step 4 - Recommend the smallest workflow

If an artifact was requested, build it after resolving essential missing facts. Otherwise give a short recommendation and offer the relevant artifact.

Recommended approach: Require a written request with evidence, route it by grade, and record the decision and effective date as one object.

Why this one: Promotion decisions drift when the request, the evidence and the decision live in different places. One record with a decision field fixes the trail.

Workflow: Request submitted → Criteria check → Approval → Decision → People and payroll update

Step 5 - Build only on request

Once the user asks for it, derive the fields from the confirmed context and emit the requested artifacts. For machine-readable text, keep prose outside the data; for files, provide a usable link. Report material validation failures or limitations separately.

A selected Notion output is rendered by notion-manual-import, so route the Notion step there. When the user selects Notion, hand that step to @notion-manual-import: it holds the CSV, the property mapping, the import steps and the verification checklist, and it renders the Field Reference below instead of defining a table of its own. Do not restate the mapping here and do not improvise the import steps. Manual CSV and mapping outputs need no connection. For requested workspace changes, follow the shared contract: verify actual tool access and the target before writing. A user saying "connected" is not tool evidence. Never ask for a Notion password or token.

For an Excel-compatible CSV, use UTF-8 with a byte order mark so Excel opens the text correctly. A CSV is not an .xlsx workbook; create .xlsx only when the user requests a workbook. A CSV carries no types, so after it, name the columns that need a number, date or currency format applied.

Request Title,Employee Name,Department,Request Type,Current Job Title,Current Grade,Requested Job Title,Requested Grade,Requested By,Justification,Linked Performance Review,OKR Score,Behaviour Score,Courses Completed,Time in Role (Months),Criteria Met,Current Salary,Proposed Salary,Currency,Increase %,Approver,Decision,Effective Date,Status,Upgrade ID
Promotion to L3,Example Employee,Delivery,Promotion,HR Executive,L2,Finance Analyst,L3,Example Manager,Consistent delivery over 12 months,REV-2026-Q1,0.7,4,"Advanced SQL, Workplace Safety",18,FALSE,1450000.00,1624000.00,INR,12,Example Approver,Pending,,Under Review,

CREATE TABLE promotion_upgrade_requests (
  request_title VARCHAR(255),
  employee_name VARCHAR(255),
  department VARCHAR(255),
  request_type VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
  current_job_title VARCHAR(255),
  current_grade VARCHAR(255),
  requested_job_title VARCHAR(255),
  requested_grade VARCHAR(255),
  requested_by VARCHAR(255),
  justification VARCHAR(255),
  linked_performance_review VARCHAR(255),  -- relation -> target record
  okr_score NUMERIC,
  behaviour_score NUMERIC,
  courses_completed VARCHAR(255),
  time_in_role_months INTEGER CHECK (time_in_role_months >= 0),
  criteria_met BOOLEAN,
  current_salary NUMERIC(14,2) CHECK (current_salary >= 0),
  proposed_salary NUMERIC(14,2) CHECK (proposed_salary >= 0),
  currency VARCHAR(255),
  increase_pct NUMERIC,
  approver VARCHAR(255),
  decision VARCHAR(255),
  effective_date DATE,
  status VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
  upgrade_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
  created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
  updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE INDEX idx_promotion_upgrade_requests_status ON promotion_upgrade_requests (status);

{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "title": "Promotion & Upgrade Requests",
  "type": "object",
  "additionalProperties": false,
  "properties": {
      "Request Title": { "type": "string" },
      "Employee Name": { "type": "string" },
      "Department": { "type": "string" },
      "Request Type": { "type": "string" },
      "Current Job Title": { "type": "string" },
      "Current Grade": { "type": "string" },
      "Requested Job Title": { "type": "string" },
      "Requested Grade": { "type": "string" },
      "Requested By": { "type": "string" },
      "Justification": { "type": "string" },
      "Linked Performance Review": { "type": "string" },
      "OKR Score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
      "Behaviour Score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
      "Courses Completed": { "type": "string" },
      "Time in Role (Months)": { "type": ["integer", "null"], "minimum": 0 },
      "Criteria Met": { "type": "boolean" },
      "Current Salary": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
      "Proposed Salary": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
      "Currency": { "type": "string" },
      "Increase %": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
      "Approver": { "type": "string" },
      "Decision": { "type": "string" },
      "Effective Date": { "type": ["string", "null"], "format": "date" },
      "Status": { "type": "string" },
      "Upgrade ID": { "type": "integer" }
  },
  "required": [
      "Request Type",
      "Status"
  ]
}

| CSV column | Notion property | Set after import |
|---|---|---|
| Request Title | Title | Use as the database title |
| Employee Name | Text | Leave as Text |
| Department | Text | Leave as Text |
| Request Type | Select (add options after import) | Convert to Select, add options: "Promotion", "Grade Upgrade", "Role Change", "Salary Revision" |
| Current Job Title | Text | Leave as Text |
| Current Grade | Text | Leave as Text |
| Requested Job Title | Text | Leave as Text |
| Requested Grade | Text | Leave as Text |
| Requested By | Text | Leave as Text |
| Justification | Text | Leave as Text |
| Linked Performance Review | Relation (link to the target database) | Convert to Relation, link to the target database |
| OKR Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Behaviour Score | Number | Convert to Number |
| Courses Completed | Text | Leave as Text |
| Time in Role (Months) | Number | Convert to Number |
| Criteria Met | Checkbox | Convert to Checkbox |
| Current Salary | Number (format: currency) | Convert to Number, set format to Currency |
| Proposed Salary | Number (format: currency) | Convert to Number, set format to Currency |
| Currency | Text | Leave as Text |
| Increase % | Number | Convert to Number |
| Approver | Text | Leave as Text |
| Decision | Text | Leave as Text |
| Effective Date | Date | Convert to Date |
| Status | Select (add options after import) | Convert to Select, add options: "Submitted", "Under Review", "Approved", "Declined", "Implemented" |
| Upgrade ID | Text (preserve source ID) | Keep imported IDs as Text; optionally add a separate Unique ID property |

The rows above are documentation examples only. Emit empty templates unless the user explicitly requests examples. Money stays currency, dates stay date, and anything pointing at another table stays relation.

Field Reference

Select Options

Request Type

Promotion | Grade Upgrade | Role Change | Salary Revision

Status

Submitted | Under Review | Approved | Declined | Implemented

Relations

Link fields: Linked Performance Review

Examples

Prompt

Promotions happen over email and the reasoning is lost.

Context first - one question per message, nothing already answered:

Q: Who can request? A: Line managers.

Q: Criteria? A: Performance and time in role.

Q: How often? A: Twice a year.

Recommended next step - offered, not built:

Require a written request with evidence, route it by grade, and record the decision and effective date as one object.

Workflow: Request submitted → Criteria check → Approval → Decision → People and payroll update

Want the CSV, SQL, JSON Schema and Notion mapping for this?

Best Practices

• Build when requested; recommend and offer a build for advice-only requests.
• One question per message. A batched intake reads as a form and gets guessed at.
• Keep display names identical across CSV and JSON; document normalized SQL identifiers.
• Use relation for anything that points at another table, text only for free text.
• Money fields are currency, never text. Dates are date, never free text.
• If the user requests an example row, keep it obviously fake so nobody imports it as real data.

Limitations

• Empty template only. It does not compute payroll, tax, leave balances or KPIs.
• Notion relations need both databases imported before the link column resolves.
• Select options are a starting set. Rename them to match how the business talks.
• No automation, reminders or sync. Those need the integration layer.
• Does not decide promotions or change pay. It records and routes the request.
• Legal, tax and HR review is still required before this drives real decisions.

Security & Safety Notes

• Never fill in real names, salaries, medical or banking data. Placeholders only.
• Label example rows as synthetic, and keep bank details masked.
• Local reads, generation commands, and validation are part of a requested artifact build. External writes, messages, provisioning, and publication require authorization for that action and target; existing explicit authorization does not need to be repeated.
• If sensitive data is supplied, avoid repeating unnecessary identifiers. Use only what the requested review needs; keep generated templates empty. Do not claim deletion from the conversation or service storage.
• Privacy, legal and disciplinary cases need a qualified human reviewer before anything is acted on.

Common Pitfalls

• Problem: a static mapping is described as a completed workspace build. Solution: deliver manual mappings without a connection; claim a live change only after the authorized tool operation succeeds.
• Problem: asked all six questions in one message. Solution: ask one, wait, and drop any the first answer already covered.
• Problem: built a full system when one table was asked for. Solution: build what was requested; mention the parent skill separately.
• Problem: all four artifacts drift apart. Solution: derive all four from the field list in this file, never by hand.
• Problem: Notion import shows every column as Text. Solution: that is expected. Apply the property mapping table once, after import.

Related Skills

• Module Catalog - find the relevant module, then read its skill.
• @people-directory - the employee master record most modules link to.
• @notification-reminder-hub - turns due dates in this module into reminders.

Reusable Prompt

I want to set up promotion, grade upgrade, role change and salary revision requests for my company.
Ask me one short question at a time, and only about what I have not already told you.
Then recommend the smallest setup that fits, and wait for me to ask before you build it.
When I ask, output CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, a Notion property mapping or an Excel workbook. Data only.

Draft requests may have unknown scores, salary proposal, criteria or effective date; do not force fabricated values. Increase % is 100 * (proposed - current) / current, only for the same currency/pay period and current > 0; otherwise null/unknown. Record score scale and rubric separately (0.7 and 4 are not comparable units). Enforce nonnegative salary and months during imports; Notion checkbox cannot represent unknown criteria. Decision/criteria conflicts require a documented exception owner, not an automated recommendation. Approval metadata does not authorize payroll changes. The performance-review reference is a logical relation requiring a real target key/mapping; companion import skills are optional and unbundled.