Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.7 against Qwen's Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: vendor list prices, limits, abilities and the Artificial Analysis indexes side by side - and what OpenSmartRoute does when both are available.

CheaperQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B lists at $3.00 per million tokens blended against $10 for Claude Opus 4.7 - 3.3x less.

Intelligence: levelEven

Intelligence index 41 against 40: within a point of each other.

Stronger on codingClaude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 scores 74 on the coding index against 72 - 2 points apart.

Stronger on agenticQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 50 on the agentic index against 39 - 12 points apart.

Longer contextQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B reads 1.0M tokens at once, Claude Opus 4.7 1M.

Abilities differEven

only Claude Opus 4.7 offers image input; only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B offers open weights.

NewerQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B was released about 4 months later.

Side by side

Vendor list prices per million tokens and published limits; indexes are Artificial Analysis composites (0-100).

Specification	Claude Opus 4.7	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M tokens	$5.00	$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens	$25.0	$6.00
Blended (3 in : 1 out)	$10.0	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.50	$0.25
Context window	1M	1.0M
Max output	128K	909K
Input	text, image, file	text
Output	text	text
Tool calls
Structured output
Reasoning
Open weights
Intelligence index	41	40
Coding index	74	72
Agentic index	39	50
Released	Apr 16, 2026	Aug 12, 2026
Available on this deployment

What a month costs

List price times tokens for three typical workloads; your mix of input and output decides which model's pricing suits you.

Workload	Claude Opus 4.7	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B	Difference
Support chat20M tokens in, 5M out a month - a help desk answering a few thousand conversations.	$225	$70.00	$155 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Document summaries100M in, 5M out - long inputs, short answers.	$625	$230	$395 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Coding assistant60M in, 20M out - a team's editor assistant, output-heavy.	$800	$240	$560 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

What the router does with the pair

The two measure the same on the intelligence index, so the router treats them as peers and lets price, observed latency and your outcomes decide: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B wins on cost, and a few bad outcomes on either move the next requests to the other.

Price a request Playground

yaml

# targets.yaml - both models as routing targets (metadata.model links each to the catalogue entry)
targets:
  - { id: qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b, kind: llm, metadata: { model: qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b } }
  - { id: claude-opus-4.7, kind: llm, metadata: { model: anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 } }

# rules.yaml - the cheaper model by default, the stronger one when the request is hard
rules:
  - name: simple-requests-stay-cheap
    when: { max_complexity: 0.45 }
    prefer: [qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b]
    weight: 0.8
  - name: hard-requests-escalate
    when: { min_complexity: 0.45 }
    prefer: [claude-opus-4.7]
    weight: 0.8

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?: No. Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5.00 in / $25.0 out per million tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $2.00 in / $6.00 out; blended, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the cheaper one.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?: On the Artificial Analysis intelligence index Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher (41 against 40). "Better" depends on the task: the coding and agentic indexes below and the abilities row may point the other way for your requests.
Which has the longer context window?: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B - 1.0M tokens against 1M.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B together?: Yes. Declare both as targets and OpenSmartRoute picks one per request on quality for the task, price and your rules - the cheaper model for the requests it can answer, the stronger one for the rest - and records why in the trace.

Also compared

Every Anthropic and Qwen model, with prices, is on the vendor pages; the rankings show what the router actually picks.

For the business

What it means for which models you pay for.

Catalogue of every vendor
The right model, not the famous one
Price, context, abilities and benchmark indexes side by side, with the model that fits each task named.
The rankings
89% less
Lower cost per request
On the 150-prompt benchmark the router spent 89% less than sending every prompt to the reference model, and the judged quality went up, not down.
Read the benchmark
Per million tokens, every model
Prices you can compare
The catalogue prints input and output prices and what three typical monthly workloads cost on each.
The model catalogue

Which LLM is the cheapest for our workload?: The best-for pages rank the live catalogue per task by the index that measures it, and the router picks the cheapest model that meets your quality rule for each request.
How much can we save on our LLM bill?: On the public benchmark the router saved 89% against sending everything to the reference model. Import last month's provider bill on the bill page and the estimate is computed on your own traffic before you change a line of code.
How often do model prices change?: The catalogue is refreshed from the vendors' price lists; each model page shows the date of its data.

Stop choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. Route to both.

Declare the pair as targets and OpenSmartRoute picks per request - the cheaper one where it holds up, the stronger one where it matters - with the comparison in every trace.

Create a free account Try a request

Free plan, no card. Fifteen thousand decisions a month with the full trace.

Specification

Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Input price / 1M tokens

$5.00

$2.00

Output price / 1M tokens

$25.0

$6.00

Blended (3 in : 1 out)

$10.0

$3.00

Cached input / 1M

$0.50

$0.25

Context window

1.0M

Max output

128K

909K

Input

text, image, file

text

Output

text

Tool calls

Structured output

Reasoning

Open weights

Intelligence index

Coding index

Agentic index

Released

Apr 16, 2026

Aug 12, 2026

Available on this deployment

Workload

Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Difference

Support chat20M tokens in, 5M out a month - a help desk answering a few thousand conversations.

$225

$70.00

$155 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Document summaries100M in, 5M out - long inputs, short answers.

$625

$230

$395 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Coding assistant60M in, 20M out - a team's editor assistant, output-heavy.

$800

$240

$560 less on Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

# targets.yaml - both models as routing targets (metadata.model links each to the catalogue entry) targets: - { id: qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b, kind: llm, metadata: { model: qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b } } - { id: claude-opus-4.7, kind: llm, metadata: { model: anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 } } # rules.yaml - the cheaper model by default, the stronger one when the request is hard rules: - name: simple-requests-stay-cheap when: { max_complexity: 0.45 } prefer: [qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b] weight: 0.8 - name: hard-requests-escalate when: { min_complexity: 0.45 } prefer: [claude-opus-4.7] weight: 0.8

Frequently asked

Is Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

No. Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5.00 in / $25.0 out per million tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $2.00 in / $6.00 out; blended, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the cheaper one.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

On the Artificial Analysis intelligence index Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher (41 against 40). "Better" depends on the task: the coding and agentic indexes below and the abilities row may point the other way for your requests.

Which has the longer context window?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B - 1.0M tokens against 1M.

Can I use Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B together?

Yes. Declare both as targets and OpenSmartRoute picks one per request on quality for the task, price and your rules - the cheaper model for the requests it can answer, the stronger one for the rest - and records why in the trace.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Side by side

What a month costs

What the router does with the pair

Frequently asked

Also compared

What it means for which models you pay for.

The right model, not the famous one

Lower cost per request

Prices you can compare

Stop choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. Route to both.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Side by side

What a month costs

What the router does with the pair

Frequently asked

Also compared

What it means for which models you pay for.

The right model, not the famous one

Lower cost per request

Prices you can compare

Stop choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. Route to both.