90 days of the enterprise, pro and team plans free, no card needed. See the plans
Model comparison
OpenAI's GPT-4.1 Mini against Qwen's Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: vendor list prices, limits, abilities and the Artificial Analysis indexes side by side - and what OpenSmartRoute does when both are available.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct lists at $0.632 per million tokens blended against $0.7 for GPT-4.1 Mini.
Intelligence index 10 against 10: within a point of each other.
GPT-4.1 Mini reads 1.0M tokens at once, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262k.
only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct offers open weights.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released about 5 months later.
Vendor list prices per million tokens and published limits; indexes are Artificial Analysis composites (0-100).
| Specification | GPT-4.1 Mini | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.21 |
| Output price / 1M tokens | $1.60 | $1.90 |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.70 | $0.63 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 33K |
| Input | image, text, file | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
| Tool calls | ||
| Structured output | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Open weights | ||
| Intelligence index | 10 | 10 |
| Coding index | 20 | - |
| Agentic index | - | - |
| Released | Apr 14, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Available on this deployment |
List price times tokens for three typical workloads; your mix of input and output decides which model's pricing suits you.
| Workload | GPT-4.1 Mini | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chat20M tokens in, 5M out a month - a help desk answering a few thousand conversations. | $16.00 | $13.70 | $2.30 less on Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
| Document summaries100M in, 5M out - long inputs, short answers. | $48.00 | $30.50 | $17.50 less on Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
| Coding assistant60M in, 20M out - a team's editor assistant, output-heavy. | $56.00 | $50.60 | $5.40 less on Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
The two measure the same on the intelligence index, so the router treats them as peers and lets price, observed latency and your outcomes decide: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins on cost, and a few bad outcomes on either move the next requests to the other.
# targets.yaml - both models as routing targets (metadata.model links each to the catalogue entry)
targets:
- { id: qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct, kind: llm, metadata: { model: qwen/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct } }
- { id: gpt-4.1-mini, kind: llm, metadata: { model: openai/gpt-4.1-mini } }
# rules.yaml - the cheaper model by default, the stronger one when the request is hard
rules:
- name: simple-requests-stay-cheap
when: { max_complexity: 0.45 }
prefer: [qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct]
weight: 0.8
- name: hard-requests-escalate
when: { min_complexity: 0.45 }
prefer: [gpt-4.1-mini]
weight: 0.8Every OpenAI and Qwen model, with prices, is on the vendor pages; the rankings show what the router actually picks.